SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM | ||||
PARTNERS JOHN ADEBIYI ¿ CHRISTOPHER W. BETTS EDWARD H.P. LAM ¿* G.S. PAUL MITCHARD QC ¿ CLIVE W. ROUGH ¿ JONATHAN B. STONE * ALEC P. TRACY * ¿ (ALSO ADMITTED IN ENGLAND & WALES) * (ALSO ADMITTED IN NEW YORK)
REGISTERED FOREIGN LAWYERS WILL H. CAI (CALIFORNIA) Z. JULIE GAO (CALIFORNIA) BRADLEY A. KLEIN (ILLINOIS) RORY MCALPINE (ENGLAND & WALES) GREGORY G.H. MIAO (NEW YORK) ALAN G. SCHIFFMAN (NEW YORK) |
42/F, EDINBURGH TOWER, THE LANDMARK 15 QUEENS ROAD CENTRAL, HONG KONG
TEL: (852) 3740-4700 FAX: (852) 3740-4727 www.skadden.com |
AFFILIATE OFFICES
BOSTON CHICAGO HOUSTON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK PALO ALTO WASHINGTON, D.C. WILMINGTON
BEIJING BRUSSELS FRANKFURT LONDON MOSCOW MUNICH PARIS SÃO PAULO Seoul SHANGHAI SINGAPORE SYDNEY TOKYO TORONTO | ||
November 7, 2014
VIA EDGAR
Barbara C. Jacobs, Assistant Director
Matthew Crispino, Staff Attorney
Gabriel Eckstein, Staff Attorney
Stephen Krikorian, Accounting Branch Chief
Ryan Rohn, Staff Accountant
Division of Corporation Finance
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549
Re: | Momo Inc. |
Amendment No. 3 to Draft Registration Statement on Form F-1 |
Submitted October 20, 2014 |
CIK No. 0001610601 |
Response to the Staffs Comment Letter Dated October 31, 2014 |
Dear Ms. Jacobs, Mr. Crispino, Mr. Eckstein, Mr. Krikorian and Mr. Rohn:
On behalf of our client, Momo Inc., a foreign private issuer organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the Company), we submit to the staff (the Staff) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) this letter setting forth the Companys responses to the comments contained in the Staffs letter dated October 31, 2014. Concurrently with the submission of this letter, the Company is filing its registration statement on Form F-1 (the Registration Statement) and certain exhibits via EDGAR. To facilitate your review, we have separately delivered to you today five courtesy copies of the Registration Statement, marked to show changes to the revised draft registration statement confidentially submitted to the Commission on October 20, 2014, and two copies of the exhibits filed with the Registration Statement.
The Staffs comments are repeated below in bold and are followed by the Companys responses. We have included page references in the Registration Statement where the language addressing a particular comment appears. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Registration Statement.
In addition, the Company encloses as Annex I to this letter the relevant portions, including translations of key excerpts, of the industry and market data from Analysys International supporting certain updated statements in the Industry section of the Registration Statement.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 10. Ordinary Shares, page F-28
1. | Your disclosure on page F-29 indicates that as of December 31, 2012 and 2013, there were 147,000,000 ordinary shares issued and outstanding of which 94,937,500 and 58,187,500 were nonvested restricted shares, respectively. Please expand your disclosures to clarify if these nonvested restricted shares have dividend rights. |
In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has added the referenced disclosure on pages F-29 and F-63 of the Registration Statement to clarify that the nonvested restricted shares have dividend rights.
Note 13. Net Loss Per Share, page F-35
2. | Your table appears to show that you used 147,000,000 ordinary shares in your calculation of basic earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. We further note your disclosure on page F-29 that of these ordinary shares issued and outstanding, a portion are nonvested restricted shares. Please clarify. If true, provide us with the guidance that you considered to include nonvested restricted shares in your basic earnings per share calculation. Refer to FASB ASC 260. |
The Company respectfully advises the Staff that all the nonvested restricted shares and vested outstanding ordinary shares are held proportionately by the four founders as disclosed in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements. With respect to the nonvested restricted shares, the founders are able to exercise all rights and privileges consistent with a holder of ordinary shares of the Company and are also entitled to nonforfeitable right to receive dividends and are equally obliged to share in the Companys losses. The repurchase right of nonvested restricted shares will be terminated upon the satisfaction of the vesting condition. Given that the holders of both nonvested restricted shares and vested outstanding ordinary shares are held by the same group of shareholders and have the same rights, privileges and obligations to the Company, the Company combined the shares together in the calculation of basic loss per share.
2
In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has revised the disclosure to in accordance with the two class method prescribed by ASC260-10-45-61A. The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the effect of this change is not material as the basic and diluted loss per share ordinary share does not change, as the founders each hold a proportionate amount of nonvested restricted shares. The Company has revised the disclosure in footnote 13 to i) separately disclose the net loss attributable to the ordinary shares and ii) exclude the nonvested ordinary shares from the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the calculation of basic and diluted loss per ordinary share. The Company has revised the disclosures on pages 9, 58, F-5, F-35 and F-49 and also add the presentation of the earnings per nonvested restricted share and vested outstanding share in F-36, F-70 and F-71 of the Registration Statement to its historical financial statements pursuant to the requirement of ASC260-10-45-61A in response to the Staffs comments.
Exhibit Index, page II-8
Exhibit 5.1
3. | It is inappropriate to limit the meaning of non-assessable with the language in parenthesis that you include in the first paragraph on page 3 of the opinion. Refer to Section II.B.1.a of Staff Legal Bulletin No. 19 (October 14, 2011). Please file a revised opinion that omits this limitation. |
The Company respectfully advises the Staff that the Company has been advised by its Cayman Islands legal counsel, Maples and Calder, that the term non-assessable is not a term of art as a matter of Cayman Islands law. Maples and Calder has advised the Company that the paragraph (including the language in the parenthesis) is a statement of the Cayman Islands legal position, and need be included where Maples and Calder is giving an opinion that shares have been issued as non-assessable.
Exhibit 99.2
4. | Refer to the first paragraph on page 3 of your opinion. Please file a revised opinion that clearly identifies the portions of your registration statement containing the opinions of Han Kun Law Offices and that states that such disclosures are the opinions of Han Kun Law Offices. |
In response to the Staffs comment, the Company has filed a revised opinion letter issued by Han Kun Law Offices as exhibit 99.2.
* * *
3
If you have any questions regarding the Registration Statement, please contact the undersigned by phone at +852-3740-4863 or via e-mail at julie.gao@skadden.com or Jeffrey Fu, the audit engagement partner at Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP, by telephone at +86 10-8520-7159 or via email at jfu@deloitte.com.cn. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP is the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company.
Very truly yours, | ||
/s/ Z. Julie Gao |
||
Z. Julie Gao |
Enclosures
cc: | Yan Tang, Chief Executive Officer, Momo Inc. |
Jonathan Xiaosong Zhang, Chief Financial Officer, Momo Inc. |
Jeffrey Fu, Partner, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Certified Public Accountants LLP |
David Zhang, Partner, Kirkland & Ellis International LLP |
Annex I
Item |
Statement in Form F-1 |
Page No. in Form F-1 |
Supporting Document |
Page No. in Supporting Document | ||||
A. | Mobile social IM is the most popular activity among mobile internet users in China. According to Analysys, mobile social IM applications ranked the highest among all mobile applications in China in terms of the average number of times each user opens the application per day in the third quarter of 2014, followed by typing method applications and mobile security applications. | 87 | Analysys Report |
53 | ||||
B. | According to Analysys, Weixin, Mobile QQ and Momo ranked as the top three mobile social IM applications in China in terms of average MAUs, average DAUs and daily average length of usage per user in the third quarter of 2014; and Momo ranked No. 2, after Weixin, in terms of the average number of times each user opens the application per day during the same period.
According to Analysys, Momo ranked No. 2 among all mobile social IM applications in China in the third quarter of 2014, immediately after Weixin, in terms of the average number of times each user opens the application per day, and Momo ranked No. 3, immediately after Weixin and Mobile QQ, in terms of average MAUs, average DAUs and daily average length of usage per user during the same period. |
87, 91 | Analysys Report |
54 | ||||
C. | According to Analysys, Weixin, Mobile QQ and Momo ranked as the top three mobile social IM applications in China in terms of average MAUs, average DAUs and daily average length of usage per user in the third quarter of 2014; and Momo ranked No. 2, after Weixin, in terms of the average number of times each user opens the application per day during the same period.
According to Analysys, Momo ranked No. 2 among all mobile social IM applications in China in the third quarter of 2014, immediately after Weixin, in terms of the average number of times each user opens the application per day, and Momo ranked No. 3, immediately after Weixin and Mobile QQ, in terms of average MAUs, average DAUs and daily average length of usage per user during the same period. |
87, 91 | Analysys Report |
55 |
D. | According to Analysys, Weixin, Mobile QQ and Momo ranked as the top three mobile social IM applications in China in terms of average MAUs, average DAUs and daily average length of usage per user in the third quarter of 2014; and Momo ranked No. 2, after Weixin, in terms of the average number of times each user opens the application per day during the same period.
According to Analysys, Momo ranked No. 2 among all mobile social IM applications in China in the third quarter of 2014, immediately after Weixin, in terms of the average number of times each user opens the application per day, and Momo ranked No. 3, immediately after Weixin and Mobile QQ, in terms of average MAUs, average DAUs and daily average length of usage per user during the same period. |
87, 91 | Analysys Report |
56 | ||||
E. | According to Analysys, Weixin, Mobile QQ and Momo ranked as the top three mobile social IM applications in China in terms of average MAUs, average DAUs and daily average length of usage per user in the third quarter of 2014; and Momo ranked No. 2, after Weixin, in terms of the average number of times each user opens the application per day during the same period.
According to Analysys, Momo ranked No. 2 among all mobile social IM applications in China in the third quarter of 2014, immediately after Weixin, in terms of the average number of times each user opens the application per day, and Momo ranked No. 3, immediately after Weixin and Mobile QQ, in terms of average MAUs, average DAUs and daily average length of usage per user during the same period. |
87, 91 | Analysys Report |
56 |
2
Translation of select excerpts
Item A. Analysys Report (page 53)
Table 4-1 2014 Q3 Ranking of Different Categories of Applications by Usage
Ranking |
Average number of times each user opens the applications per day | |
1 | Mobile instant messaging | |
2 | Mobile typing method | |
3 | Mobile security | |
4 | Mobile video | |
5 | Single-player game | |
6 | SNS | |
7 | Mobile reading | |
8 | Mobile shopping | |
9 | Mobile music | |
10 | News |